It does appear that I am not the only one that receives many spam comments from people trying to promote PayPerPlay.
Aaron Wall at SEO Book closed comments on his blog post about NetAudioAds where he talked about "NetAudioAds wasting good publicity on a Bad Idea".
What does this say about he quality of publishers and affiliates they are attracting to this Annoying Advertising Source?
It tells me that they are not looking for quality in their delivery methods and more towards quantity. While it would be easy to churn out millions of pages to deliver advertising through various mediums it just does not take into account what message the advertisers will be delivering if they embrace this advertising model.
In my opinion it will hurt the credibility of the advertiser to have ads played on spam sites like PayPerPlay is advocating for delivery of the ads if they are looking to attract offline customers to their venues. Now if they are promoting some pie in the sky internet make money from home crowd then this is the perfect advertising source as it takes a lot of visitors to make money with that stuff and those individuals are a gullible lot.
Are advertisers trying to build brand awareness of who not to do business with?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment